— Marmie
FEMINIST FEELS
Suck My Alcott
Six snarky chicks who dig Louisa May.
powered by tumblr
seattle theme by parker ehret
"…my dear, let us be elegant or die."
I’ll field this one, given that I’m rather drunk at the moment.
Personally, while I don’t MIND the relationships such as they are, I don’t feel they’re strictly necessary to further the plot or the development of the characters (perhaps with the exception of Amy/Laurie as Laurie becomes more manful with Amy to keep him in gentlemanly line whereas Jo wouldn’t have given a fuck and let him run wild, and with the responsibilities given her as a wife and mother, Amy mellows the fuck out and grows the fuck up and I promise I’ll stop saying fuck now. Fuck.)
As for Jo and Fritz, that was LMA’s response to public demand that Jo end up with SOMEBODY because god forbid a woman never marry but at least she stuck Jo with an intellectual silver fox that kind of creeps most people out because SHE DEFIES YOUR ROMANTIC EXPECTATIONS OF LOVE BEING RESERVED FOR THE YOUNG AND BEAUTIFUL. If they wouldn’t let Jo be queer/asexual, at the very least LMA could insist Jo do something different and subversive.
Because no book should be without a range of mid-century- Puffin edition, even if it was published in 2008.
Inspired by movie “Little Women”, L-R: Amy’s clothespin, Beth’s piano, Jo’s feather pen, Meg’s blue dress. I’ve always loved this book/movie, I have a lot of sisters & can relate to the closeness they share in this story.
Meg March - Ravenclaw
Jo March - Gryffindor
Beth March - Hufflepuff
Amy March - Slyterin
Louisa May Alcott: representing Harry Potter before it existed.
relevant
"Thoreau also wore a neck-beard for many years, which he insisted many women found attractive.[20] However, Louisa May Alcott mentioned to Ralph Waldo Emerson that Thoreau’s facial hair “will most assuredly deflect amorous advances and preserve the man’s virtue in perpetuity.”[20]"
I’M IN LESBIANS WITH YOU, JO
Ugh. Bitches gotta write.